Paresis and paralysis are uncommon problems in sheep but are likely to prompt farmers to seek veterinary advice. A thorough and logical approach can aid in determining the cause of the problem and highlighting the benefit of veterinary involvement. While this may not necessarily alter the prognosis for an individual animal, it can help in formulating preventive measures and avoid the costs – both in economic and in welfare terms – of misdirected treatment. Distinguishing between central and peripheral lesions is most important, as the relative prognoses are markedly different, and this can often be achieved with minimal equipment. This article describes an approach to performing a neurological examination of the ovine trunk and limbs, the ancillary tests available and the common and important causes of paresis and paralysis in sheep.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
James Patrick Crilly qualified from the University of Cambridge in 2010. He is currently a resident in farm animal health and production (sheep) at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R[D]SVS) in Edinburgh.
Nina Rzechorzek qualified from the University of Cambridge in 2010. Having completed a PhD on hypothermic preconditioning of cortical neurons, she is currently undertaking a residency in neurology at the R(D)SVS.
Philip Scott has 35 years' experience of farm animal medicine and surgery at the University of Edinburgh. He is a diplomate of the European College of Small Ruminant Health Management and the European College of Bovine Health Management.
PARESIS may be defined as ‘a deficiency in the generation of the gait or in the ability to support weight’ and implies that a degree of voluntary movement is still present. Paralysis (plegia) is the complete loss of voluntary movement. Muscle weakness is associated with both conditions but may also be due to other causes.
With reference to the chief complaint, it is important to ask the farmer about onset, duration, evolution (static, progressive, waxing and waning, episodic) and lateralisation of clinical signs (unilateral, bilateral, more marked on the right or left). Ascertaining which animals and how many are affected is also important, as are any relevant husbandry factors. Examples include:
▪ What are the sheep currently being fed? Has the diet changed recently?
▪ Are there known/suspected mineral/trace element deficiencies on the farm?
▪ Has the affected animal/group/flock received any treatments recently?
▪ Is the flock open or closed?
▪ What is the origin of the affected animals?
The core objectives of a neurological examination, together with the history, are to determine:
▪ Whether the condition is neurological;
▪ What part of the nervous system is affected;
▪ A list of differential diagnoses for the clinical signs observed;
▪ An appreciation of the severity of the disease (in order to give a prognosis).
A neurological examination should always be accom-panied by a full clinical examination to avoid missing non-neurological causes of the presenting complaint (eg, orthopaedic), as well as those that manifest in neurological signs secondary to generalised metabolic, infectious, toxic or nutritional disturbances (Box 1).
Common causes of recumbency in sheep
It is important to determine whether a recumbent sheep is down due to a primary nervous system lesion or is affected by a different problem that may be unrelated to the nervous system or that may affect it indirectly. Examples of commonly encountered causes of recumbency include:
Primary neurological disorders
▪ Listeriosis (infection of the trigeminal nerve and associated brainstem nuclei by Listeria monocytogenes);
▪ Spinal cord trauma.
Systemic disturbances that affect the nervous system (secondary neurological disorders)
▪ Hypocalcaemia (see Video 1);
▪ Polioencephalomalacia (cerebrocortical necrosis), eg, thiamine deficiency.
An initial assessment should be made from a distance. The demeanour, stance and posture of the animal should be observed. If it is recumbent, is there opisthotonos (marked dorsal extension of the head and neck)? Do the limbs appear flaccid or rigidly extended? Does it display the Schiff–Sherrington phenomenon (Table 3)? If it is able, the animal should be encouraged to stand, walk and turn, and the following assessed:
▪ What stance does the animal adopt? Is it wide based or narrow based?
▪ What is the posture? Is there kyphosis (dorsal curvature of the spine), lordosis (ventral curvature of the spine), scoliosis (lateral deviation of the spine), torticollis (twisting of the neck) or an abnormal head carriage? Are the elbows, hocks or fetlocks dropped?
▪ Is the face symmetrical? If not, which areas are affected and how do they differ?
▪ Is the gait normal?
Is there any ataxia (poor coordination when moving) and which limbs are affected?
Is the protraction–retraction of each limb normal, hypometric or hypermetric?
Is the gait stiff or stilted?
Is there any paresis or plegia? (Note, toe dragging indicates paresis; this is sometimes more easily heard than seen but hoof scuffing may give clues);
Does the problem affect one limb, a pair of limbs or all four limbs?
▪ If the animal circles, are the circles tight or wide and in which direction?
Animals should be observed for involuntary movements such as tremor (involuntary oscillating contraction of antagonistic muscle groups) or myoclonus (sudden contraction followed by immediate relaxation of a specific muscle group).
The assessment should then be followed by a general clinical examination and a specific neurological examination. Particular attention should focus on eliminating other causes if a neurological problem is suspected. For example, muscle wasting of a limb may be the result of prolonged disuse due to an orthopaedic cause of lameness, and cardiovascular or respiratory embarrassment may be responsible for episodes of collapse. Important differential diagnoses for recumbency (other than those covered in this article) are given in Box 1.
Localising the lesion
A neuroanatomical diagnosis is required before listing differential diagnoses of any neurological problem. Certain problems/pathologies are more common at particular sites than others. A systematic approach using only very basic tools can yield accurate information about a lesion's location and distribution (whether it is focal, multifocal or diffuse, and symmetrical or asymmetrical). The priority is to identify a single site that explains all of the neurological signs observed, since multifocal lesions are less common.
The stages of the close-up neurological examination can be performed in any order but should be methodical and consistent to avoid missing important information. The authors find it easiest to start at the head with assessment of mentation and behaviour, abnormal head carriage, head tremor, head turn or head tilt, facial symmetry and more specific testing of the cranial nerves (Table 1). When assessing the indicators of cranial nerve function, it must be remembered that non-neurological causes of abnormalities are also possible (eg, facial symmetry disrupted by swelling and tongue position, and movement disrupted by injury). The gag reflex is difficult to assess in sheep due to the narrow oral aperture and long buccal cavity. Facial and trigeminal nerve dysfunction is often accompanied by food packing into the cheeks, and the corneal reflex is a reliable test of cranial nerve VI function only if the eyelids are held open to observe the retraction of the globe.
The range of motion of the neck or a pain response elicited on manipulation or palpation of the neck, back, muscles or joints may identify a region for further investigation. Subsequently, if the animal is standing, tests of proprioception, such as a modified ‘paper-slide test’, should be performed (Box 2).
Testing postural reactions and spinal reflexes
It is more difficult to test postural reactions in sheep than in small animals or horses because they are less tolerant of their limbs being handled. The authors find the easiest method is to place a foot on a robust piece of plastic (eg, an old feed sack) and, ensuring the animal is weight bearing on that limb, drawing the plastic laterally to assess how rapidly the animal detects the displacement of the limb and how accurately it returns the limb to the accustomed position. Hopping tests, wheelbarrow tests, hemiwalking, and visual and tactile placing tests as performed in small animals can be performed with lambs and small adult sheep
Cutaneous trunci (panniculus) reflex
This reflex has a segmental input and a unitary output at the level of C8-T1 running to the cutaneous trunci muscle of the flank. In response to a light stimulus (eg, a fly landing on the animal's side), the cutaneous trunci contracts several times. It is best stimulated by gently pinching the skin in the region of the sublumbar fossa and the corresponding area of the thoracic flank (it can frequently be elicited by touching the tip of a ballpoint pen on the skin). Sequential stimulation of the flank from the caudal to cranial aspect can help locate a spinal lesion, ie, the cutaneous trunci reflex cannot be stimulated below the lesion but is intact above it. Due to the overlap of dermatomes, precise localisation (ie, to a single nerve root segment) is often not possible
To assess the perineal reflex, the skin of the perineal region is pinched firmly. A normal response entails contraction of the anal sphincter and ventroflexion of the tail, and should occur irrespective of which side of the perineum is pinched. A reduced response indicates damage to the sacral spinal cord segments or damage to the pudendal and caudal rectal nerves (Constable 2004)
Tests for myotatic reflexes involve an afferent (sensory) arm and an efferent (motor) arm that often involve the same nerve trunk; both arms communicate in the same spinal segment. Decreased reflexes are due to muscular disorders, peripheral neuropathies or damage to the spinal segment where the nerve(s) involved originate. An exaggerated reflex is most frequently due to a lack of descending inhibition resulting from a spinal lesion cranial to the spinal segment of nerve origin, but it may also be exaggerated if the antagonistic muscle tone is reduced. Clonus indicates a lack of descending inhibition. The most commonly used tests involve the following:
▪ Patellar reflex. This reflex tests the integrity of spinal cord segments L4-L6 and the femoral nerve. The stifle is flexed to tense the patellar tendon and the crus rested on an open palm (to avoid restricting its movement). The patellar tendon is struck with a narrow, hard object (eg, the handle of a pair of scissors). The intact reflex produces a rapid contraction of the quadriceps and extension of the stifle. When performing this test, it may help to displace the skin of the limb laterally to ensure that woolless skin overlies the tendon. Striking the muscle body or the bones will produce misleading results;
▪ Extensor carpi radialis (ECR) reflex. This reflex tests the integrity of spinal cord segments C7-T2. The carpus is flexed and the metacarpus rested on the open palm. The front of the carpus is palpated and the tendon of the ECR located. This is again lightly and sharply struck, and contraction of the ECR results in an extension of the carpus;
▪ Tendons of gastrocnemius (testing L7-S1 and the tibial nerve), biceps brachii (testing C6-C8), triceps brachii (testing C6-C8) and the muscle belly of the cranial tibial muscle (testing L6-S1 and the peroneal nerve) may be struck, but the authors find the response difficult to reliably produce in neurologically normal animals.
A painful stimulus to the distal limb (eg, pinching between the toes with artery forceps) will produce a withdrawal of the limb and should elicit flexion at all joints of that limb. This involves multiple motor units and therefore tests the integrity of a single sensory input but multiple motor outputs. A neurologically normal animal should be conscious of the stimulus as well but as sheep are stoic animals this may be hard to judge
Once the ability to withdraw the limb has been established, stimulation of different parts of the limb (eg, using a pen or forceps) can be used to assess the integrity of the sensory innervation to different parts of the limb. The crossed extensor reflex (extension of the contralateral limb when the withdrawal reflex is stimulated) is normal in neonates but indicates an upper motor neuron lesion if seen in an adult
The animal can then be laid on its side and the spinal reflexes of the uppermost limbs tested, after which the animal should be turned over and the tests repeated on the contralateral limbs. Other spinal reflexes can be tested while the animal is standing or recumbent and are described in Box 2.
Urinary function is an important indicator of caudal spinal cord disorders but is hard to assess in sheep. Has the farmer seen the animal urinate recently? Some animals will void the bladder if the nostrils are covered but this test should be performed at the end of the examination as it will distress the animal. Transabdominal ultrasonography (inguinal window) allows bladder size to be measured (Scott 2012).
Neural control of the limb musculature can be divided into local reflex arcs (Fig 1) and a descending modulation of these, which largely reduces the responsiveness of the reflex arc. Disruption of the efferent arm of a local reflex arc (a lower motor neuron [LMN] lesion) results in hyporeflexia, flaccid paralysis and rapid loss of muscle mass. Such lesions affect (from the peripheral to central aspects) the neuromuscular junction, the nerve trunk itself, the plexi where these nerves form from segmental spinal nerves, the ventral nerve roots of the segmental nerves or the spinal cord where the nerves originate. Disruption of the descending neurons (an upper motor neuron [UMN] lesion) removes inhibition from the reflex arc resulting in hyper-reflexia, spastic paralysis and a slower loss of muscle mass (Fig 2). Such a lesion occurs in the spinal cord cranial to the segment where the nerve roots give rise to the nerves involved in the reflex arc. It is accompanied by loss of conscious sensation and proprioception caudal to the lesion. An LMN lesion may have only motor deficits (damage to peripheral nerve trunks will result in sensory deficits distal to the lesion) and may occur in the spinal cord or involve only the peripheral nervous system; UMN lesions are always central (Fig 3). This distinction is important because the peripheral nervous system has a greater regenerative capacity than the central nervous system (CNS).
At the end of the neurological examination it should be possible to locate the lesion within one of the following functionally anatomical groups:
▪ Vestibular system
▪ Peripheral nerve/muscle/neuromuscular junction.
Peripheral nerve lesions
Peripheral lesions may affect either a single nerve trunk or multiple nerves within the same limb. Generalised peripheral neuropathies do occur (botulism, for example) but are rare in sheep. The number of nerves affected and the degree of nerve disruption affect the clinical signs seen.
The large myelinated A fibres convey motor signals to the muscle fibres and also carry proprioceptive information and are the most vulnerable to injury (eg, hypoxia). C fibres are the smallest fibres and have the lowest conduction speed but are the more refractory to injury. They convey temperature, itch and deep pain sensation.
A mild insult may result in neuropraxia – a temporary dysfunction of the axon. Spontaneous recovery is relatively rapid, within a matter of days. If the insult is more severe, resulting in transection of the axons, then recovery is possible but this relies on the myelin sheath and connective tissue surrounding the nerve remaining intact. The axon can re-extend within this framework but this is a slow process. This type of injury is known as axonotmesis. If the nerve structure (ie, axons and myelin sheaths) is highly disrupted (neurotmesis), then this axonal regeneration may well not reach its intended target, leading to a permanent loss of function. Whether reinnervation occurs depends on the size of the gap between the proximal and distal nerve segments. Neuroma (a swelling resulting from haphazard regrowth of the axons and often a cause of discomfort) is one potential outcome of failed regeneration. Functional deficits may also arise due to ‘reorganisation’, in which suboptimal repair results in the axon terminating in an ‘off-target’ site.
Presenting signs and common causes of some peripheral nerve lesions are listed in Table 2.
As spontaneous recovery is possible, and as long as any rectifiable problem has been attended to (eg, a foreign body removed, an abscess drained), then supportive care and minimising the accidental self-trauma that accompanies limb flaccidity can yield satisfactory results. For example, where fetlock ‘knuckling’ occurs, splinting of the distal limb to prevent trauma to the dorsum of the foot is indicated. Spontaneous recovery may take many weeks and clients must be prepared for a long wait without a guarantee of recovery.
Spinal lesions have a poorer prognosis than peripheral nerve lesions due to the difference in response to injury. Unlike the nerve regeneration witnessed peripherally, axonal regeneration is poor in the central nervous system due to the physical barrier presented by the glial scar and the local factors produced by CNS glia and myelin debris that are non-permissive for growth (Kotter and others 2006).
The clinical signs associated with lesions of each of the major spinal cord segments are listed in Table 3 and will depend on the severity of disruption of the spinal cord and the precise location of the lesion. Reflexes and sensation may be reduced or completely absent and a degree of difference may occur between the left and right sides if the lesion is lateral to the spinal cord (eg, a perivertebral abscess extending into the spinal canal from the left may cause more severe deficits on the left side than the right side). Cervical lesions often produce more obvious gait deficits in the hindlimbs than the forelimbs.
Particular lesions are more commonly seen in certain spinal locations and further diagnostic evidence can be gathered from the history, signalment and diagnostic tests (see below). Common spinal lesions in sheep are listed in Table 4.
Scrapie is a transmissible encephalopathy of sheep and goats. Paresis and ataxia, especially of the hindlimbs, are common clinical signs (Healy and others 2003, Jeffrey and Gonzalez 2007); quadriplegia and recumbency are seen at a later date. Other clinical signs include separation from the rest of the flock, depression, anxiety or hyperexcitability, head tremor, low head carriage, pruritus (including a ‘nibble’ response to stimulation of the back), weight loss, bruxism, cud-dropping and an absent menace response (Healy and others 2003, Konold and Phelan 2014). Most of the sheep that are affected are more than two years of age (Jeffrey and Gonzalez 2007).
Definitive diagnosis is by detection of the protease-resistant prion protein (PrPsc) in the brain on postmortem examination. Infection can be detected by the isolation of PrPsc from lymphoid tissue biopsies (eg, tonsillar tissue or rectal mucosa).
If scrapie is suspected in the UK, then the local APHA office must be notified.
Maedi-visna is caused by maedi-visna virus (MVV), a small ruminant lentivirus. A variety of clinical syndromes follow infection, including progressive weight loss accompanied by dyspnoea and tachypnoea due to a lymphoid infiltrate of the interalveolar septa (maedi), indurative mastitis and, more rarely, arthritis and a neurological form (visna) (Pritchard and McConnell 2007).
Visna is most commonly seen in heavily infected flocks with widespread maedi, but there is some suggestion of different strains of MVV having different degrees of neurotropism (Payne and others 2004, Benavides and others 2006). Early clinical signs include unilateral paresis of a hindlimb (Fig 4) progressing to ataxia, hindlimb paralysis, recumbency and death. Other signs include fine head tremor, circling, progressive head tilt, visual impairment and separation from the rest of the flock (Pritchard and McConnell 2007). Affected animals are usually four to five years old but rapidly progressive disease has been reported in lambs as young as four months of age (Benavides and others 2007). Visna is more rapidly progressive than maedi, with affected animals dying or being euthanased within weeks of the onset of clinical signs. As visna is usually seen in flocks in which maedi is already present, suspicion may be high on clinical signs alone.
Affected animals are seropositive. Histopathology findings at postmortem examination include non-suppurative encephalitis affecting the cerebellum. MVV can be demonstrated immunohistopathologically or by PCR in the cerebellum at postmortem examination.
Ancillary diagnostic techniques
Additional diagnostic techniques can help to confirm a diagnosis; however, those that are within the remit of specialist referral centres, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), will not be considered here.
Cerebrospinal fluid sampling
Cerebrospinal fluid bathes the CNS and protects it from mechanical damage. It is produced at the choroid plexi within the ventricles of the brain. Under normal circumstances it is a clear, colourless fluid with a very low cell count, consisting mainly of macrophages. It can be sampled from two sites – the cisterna magna, which lies deep to the foramen magnum of the skull, and the lumbosacral space. Sampling from the cisterna magna requires deep sedation or general anaesthesia and carries with it the risk of iatrogenic brain damage. Sampling from the lumbosacral space is much easier, can be performed on the conscious animal and carries a lower risk of iatrogenic damage. Box 3 describes the sampling method. As there is rarely a significant difference between the samples obtained from either site, lumbosacral sampling is preferred in the majority of cases.
Technique for sampling cerebrospinal fluid
▪ Place the sheep in sternal recumbency with an assistant kneeling in front and grasping the animal's hocks. Positioning may be assisted by sedation of the animal
▪ Pull the hocks forward to extend the leg, flex the hip and flex the caudal spine; this widens the lumbosacral space. The landmarks that can be seen are the two wings of the ilium and the dorsal spinous processes
▪ With the thumb and ring finger on the wings of the ilium and the index finger lying along the dorsal spinous processes, feel the lumbosacral space as a depression just caudal to a line drawn between the two iliac crests, as shown in the photograph on the right
▪ Prepare this area surgically and place a small bleb of local anaesthetic beneath the skin
▪ Advance a needle slowly, perpendicular to the skin. A decrease in resistance will be felt as the point passes through the interarcuate ligament. The needle should be cautiously advanced until cerebrospinal fluid wells up in the hub
▪ Collect the fluid as it drips from the needle hub or attach a 5 ml syringe and apply gentle suction. No more than 2 ml should be aspirated
▪ Place the fluid in an EDTA tube immediately (Scott 1993)⇓
Changes to the CSF that are relevant include:
▪ Blood staining – this is due to very recent haemorrhage or artefactual due to iatrogenic damage of vessels within the spinal canal. Sedimentation over several hours or centrifugation will clear the colour;
▪ Xanthochromic appearance – yellow/orange discolouration is indicative of past haemorrhage; centrifugation will not clear the colour. Haemosiderophages may be seen among the cells present;
▪ Frothy appearance, which forms a stable foam when shaken – this indicates that the protein content is increased;
▪ Turbidity – the cell count is much higher than normal (eg, in bacterial meningitis; in this case the fraction of neutrophils is also increased).
If there are no gross changes, the fluid should be submitted for laboratory analysis of the protein concentration because disruption of the flow of CSF (as occurs with a space-occupying lesion compressing the spinal cord) results in an increase in the protein concentration of the CSF caudal to the lesion – a phenomenon known as Froin's syndrome (Scott and Will 1991). This increase is too small to be detected using a refractometer.
Analysis of the cell types present within the CSF can also aid in diagnosis and can be performed at a low cost using sedimentation with standard Diff-Quik staining of the sediment and simple light microscopy (see Lowrie and Anderson  for a full description of this technique). Sarcocystis merozoites have also been identified in CSF samples from sheep with neurological signs (Formisano and others 2013).
Radiography of the spine can detect gross distortions of the bones of the vertebral column or the limbs. The clarity of images of sheep is often limited by the fleece, which adds artefacts and prevents placement of the plate as close to the area in question as is possible in other species. Nonetheless, it can be helpful in the detection of fractures or gross changes associated with osteomyelitis or perivertebral infections (Fig 5).
Ultrasonography can be used to detect perivertebral abscesses in the cervical area, for example, those derived from intramuscular injection in the neck using dirty needles or irritant substances (see Video 4). It may also be used to assess the degree of urinary bladder distension (Scott and Sargison 2010) that may occur as a result of damage to the pelvic nerves (eg, in cauda equina syndrome).
The injection of contrast material into the epidural space can be performed at the same lumbosacral site as for CSF sampling (Fig 6). Approximately 5 ml injected into a two- to three-month-old lamb (15 to 20 kg) will allow imaging of the thoracolumbar spine. Elevating the hindquarters after injection aids cranial spread of the contrast material. The dorsal and or ventral columns on the lateral view will appear narrowed if the spinal cord is compressed. Dorsoventral projections are often very hard to interpret in sheep.
While this technique can aid the detection of spinal cord compression that is not accompanied by bony changes, it may not add any further information on localisation and is probably too costly for all but the most valuable animals.
The diagnosis of certain causes of paresis or paralysis may have implications for the flock as a whole. The response may be governed by law, as with suspected scrapie, or will have to be worked out between the vet and the flock owner.
Some sporadic problems, such as neuropathies due to injury or occasional cases of vertebral body osteomyelitis, may not require any changes to flock management if they occur in singly; however, larger numbers of these problems should prompt careful investigation to identify the risk factors. For example, if many cases of atlanto-occipital joint infection (Fig 7) are seen in a flock, then colostrum intake, lambing shed hygiene and tick challenge, as well as the incidence of related problems such as infectious polyarthritis, should be evaluated.
Other problems, such as swayback (which rarely occurs singly and has a management-related cause [insufficient copper available in the diet of the pregnant ewe]), should automatically prompt discussion of the cause of the disease and control of risk factors pertaining to it.
Causes of paresis and paralysis with flock implications and examples of control measures are summarised in Table 5.
A logical approach incorporating a basic neurological examination can allow localisation of lesions causing paresis or paralysis. This, alongside history and signalment, will often allow a presumptive diagnosis that is sufficient to provide a prognosis and decide on treatment. Further diagnostic tests will allow confirmation of diagnoses made on clinical grounds. The individual prognosis and flock implications of the various causes of limb paresis/paralysis in sheep are widely variable and an accurate diagnosis is vital in ensuring the welfare of individuals and the health of the flock.
Diagnosing limb paresis and paralysis in sheep
A number of videos accompany the online version of this article at: http://inpractice.bmj.com
Nina Rzechorzek is funded by a Wellcome Trust Integrated Training Fellowship for Veterinarians (096409/Z/11/Z). Funding sources did not have any involvement in the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.