Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Farm Animal Practice
Bacterial counts in bulk milk - an underused investigation technique
  1. Roger Blowey

    Roger Blowey is a partner in a mixed practice in Gloucester He is an RCVS specialist in cattle health and production and, in 1995, was awarded an FRCVS for meritorious contributions to learning.

  2. Jennifer Davis

    Jennifer Davis has worked with Roger Blowey as a laboratory technician for over 20 years. Her main interests lie in the field of microbiology. She is a member of the Royal Institute of Public Health and Hygiene.

  3. Peter Edmondson

    Peter Edmondson is a partner in a nine-person, predominantly dairy practice in Shepton Mallet, Somerset. He holds the RCVS certificate in cattle health and production and was awarded an FRCVS in 1994.


THE total bacterial count (TBC) of bulk milk is an important measure of milk quality. Since 1982, dairy farmers have been paid a bonus for milk containing less than 20,000 bacteria per ml. In 1996, cultural methods of examination were replaced by an automated methodology, Bactoscan, which is based on staining live bacteria and counting particle numbers. It has the advantages of being cheaper, with a faster throughput and more rapid result. It also gives a higher value than standard cultural methods, since not all organisms grow on basic media. However, cultural examination of milk can still yield useful information and, by using differential culture methods, possible causes of a high TBC, high cell count or even a high mastitis incidence can be investigated. This article describes the techniques used and some of the results obtained by a practice laboratory.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.